
Showing posts with label social networking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social networking. Show all posts
Friday, December 31, 2010
71) Legacy Of The Hopeless

Thursday, September 30, 2010
61) United
Remember when I told you about that speck of light in that new technological monument? You know, that Halo: Reach thingy?Now that the game's been out for awhile, the monument has finally shut down (a personal Facebook message told me so), so let's take a look back on what was accomplished here.
Over the course of about a month, 118,422 people used their Facebook pages to post a contribution to the memorial. That's not counting the people who visited the site and didn't have an Facebook to contribute. (Rare these days, no?)
The dots came from all over the world, stretching from Milan to Osaka. Hell, they made a video about it:
In that earlier post, I talked about being united, having a sense of belonging. It all becomes much more satisfying once you know the numbers and statistics behind this little advertising campaign. People all over the world, many of whom will never meet each other, used the internet to share a single common passion. It's difficult to grasp that something like this, especially for a video game, could've happened just little over a decade ago.
That's what the internet revolution has done for us. If the new Facebook movie is any indication, it's that the internet plays a vital role in our lives. Instead of us mastering it, it now has the ability to master us.
It has the potential to bring us to tears, make us laugh, do stupid things, etc. Next to that, you've got the cultivation of a new online language as legal as ebonics, pictures of cats and their witty captions, or Youtube videos of morons hurting themselves.
I admit even I feel a bit internet incompetent sometimes. Coming from a seventeen-year old that spends 50% of his time on a computer, this might seem blasphemous. But then again, you don't see alot of seventeen year-olds these days convey information in readable grammar and spelling. (I try, anyway) Some of my peers would find this revulsive, just as their English teachers would cry tears over their texts.
Even a youngster like me can't help but feel a little slow when it comes to texting, Twittering, etc. I don't do texting or Twittering, but the fear exists in me that someday I might be forced to do it for some job or something.
Technology is indeed growing more generational by the day. Why a couple of days ago, I had a good laugh when my English teacher couldn't make his projector connect to his laptop. I sensed that he could feel our snickering eyes follow his every action, but when he finally got it to work, there was a loud and clear "Ha!" directed right back at us.
So there exists the possibility that when I'm old enough to be a sagacious teacher, I won't be able to keep up with technological trends. Who knows? By then paper books might be extinct, or they've perfected installing whole computers into a chip that can plug into your head.
At least I won't go it alone. As a generation, we can be united. Not necessarily to control the world with technology, but rather provide a voice of reason against technology controlling us.
For now, I can settle for being number 81,361 out of 118,422 little dots, all soldiers of an online generation.
Labels:
adolescence,
Facebook,
Halo,
internet,
social networking,
society,
video games
Monday, August 9, 2010
52) Losing Steam
With my recent readings in Newsweek, I came across an article that was so vitally important to the existence of this blog. Your blog. Wikipedia. Twitter.So begs the question: is social networking a fad waiting to die out?
Many other elements of the user-generated revolution, meanwhile, are beginning to look sluggish. The practice of crowd sourcing, in particular, worked because the early Web inspired a kind of collective fever, one that made the slog of writing encyclopedia entries feel new, cool, fun. But with three out of four American households online, contributions to the hive mind can seem a bit passé, and Web participation, well, boring—kind of like writing encyclopedia entries for free.The article goes on to state that Wikipedia is down on edits, Blogging has withered as a past time, and that 90% of tweets come from only 10% of users.
The possibility is that many people are simply being worn out by all this online sharing and exploring. Inherently, they only go on because other people do it, not because they actually want to contribute. Like any other fad, it grips based on peer pressure.
Or maybe it's because Americans naturally hate responsibilities. This blog started out as a school assignment, and only continues to live because I actually WANT to contribute. For only my own benefit? Perhaps. But none of the classmates whose blogs I follow continue to spew the perspective I crave. They've all gone down.
Then again, it is summer, so maybe we'll see a spark back up when the school year starts. Laziness seems to settle in as a huge factor here. Or as the article so states:
Even the internet is no match for the sloth.So now, it turns out that many of these sites are turning to bait tactics:
And comment-driven news and aggregation sites like Gawker and The Huffington Post, where part of the fun is reading what the peanut gallery has to say, have decided to show the peanut gallery more love: mostly in the form of badges, stars, and special privileges. Even YouTube has added inducements, giving users the chance to play at Carnegie Hall—with a music contest—and partnering with the Guggenheim Museum to help them show off their art.Are we really that lazy to keep fads running? Well, I guess they're called fads for a reason. Take a look at the internet trend map and tell me how much you recognize.
So far it seems to be working. After Gawker introduced its Star system, which gave preference to the work of “Starred” commentators, participation on the comment boards rose to a new high. The Huffington Post, which offers its best users digital merit badges and special rights (like the ability to delete other people’s posts), boasts the most active commenters of any news site. And Yelp says it has maintained a pace of a million new reviews every three months.
Such reward programs are only likely to grow more important, especially as the Web reaches into corners of the world where it never benefited from the frisson of a social movement. Last year, in parts of eastern Africa, Google launched the Kiswahili Wikipedia Challenge, an effort to grow the number of Swahili-language Wikipedia entries by tying them to the chance to win modems, cell phones, and a laptop. It worked. This wouldn’t surprise Jeff Howe, the author of Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. Back in 2006, he predicted that the winners in the social-media world would be “those that figure out a formula for making their users feel amply compensated.” Prizes are a start. Can cash be far behind? Oh, right, then it would just be a job.
Live and let die.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)